The term is used to describe the method that allows copy link to access many different databases of law enforcement agencies with varying data fields is a multi-dimensional approach Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a multi-dimensional approach?</h3>
Generally, Because we are utilizing an appropriate and specialized way to access the data basis of law enforcement under multiple data fields, we are able to state that the described method operates under the term known as a multi-dimensional approach.
This is an approach in which the database is accessed and analyzed via numerous dimensions, or we can call data to feel categories, in order to produce appropriate results and more efficient functioning.
In summary, we may reach the following conclusion after reviewing the information presented above: the choice that was picked is the optimal response to the inquiry that was posed.
The question that was presented before has been addressed and clarified; if you have any other questions, please leave them in the comments area below.
Read more about the multi-dimensional approach
brainly.com/question/14522063
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) deposits
Explanation:
In the case of the commercial banking system, the liabilities is deposits as the deposit is the amount of the depositors
So as per the given situation, the option A is correct as the deposits represents the commercial banking liabilities
hence, all the other options are incorrect
Therefore, the same is to be considered
It doesn't take that long to be honest, I got mine in a week
Answer:
NO, court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the landscaper's contract claim
Explanation:
given data
landscape work = $30,000
seeking in damages = $100,000
solution
landscaper assert and maintain claim against an home owner for breach of contract is no because court have diversity of an citizenship in the jurisdiction over an home owner for negligence claims .
we know that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure permit only counter claims and federal court have not any subject matter jurisdiction over an landscaper contract claims
<span>Economists would describe Jeff as a user of a public good. Jeff would be considered this because he is consuming something, but this consumption does not reduce the availability of the thing being consumed for others. Jeff is using the cable service, but this does not prevent anyone else from receiving and watching a cable service.</span>