Answer:
Late Majority.
Explanation:
The adoption of a product by consumers is divided into five categories, namely, <u>innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards</u>. Such customers are known as adopters who adopt to new technology differently. The category of adopters was proposed by Everett Rogers in 1962.
In the given scenario, Emy exemplifies Late majority adopter.
Late Majority adopters are those adopters who adopts new innovation or technology after observing that the product has been adopted fruitfully by the majority of society. They rank on the second last position of the adopters. They are more skeptical to the product before adopting it. So, Emy fits the late majority category of adopters as she is skeptical about the fancy device shown by her friend.
Answer:
Annual depreciation (year 1)= $1,400
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Buying price= $36,000.
Useful units= 300,000 units of product.
Salvage value= $6,000
During its first year, the machine produces 14,000 units of product.
To calculate the depreciation expense for the first year under the units of production method, we need to use the following formula:
Annual depreciation= [(original cost - salvage value)/useful life of production in units]*units produced
Annual depreciation= [(36,000 - 6,000)/300,000]*14,000
Annual depreciation= 0.1*14,000= $1,400
Answer:
All net income, less all dividends, since the company began operations.
Explanation:
Retained Earnings are the retained profits that the company keeps with itself, for meeting any case of emergency or for growing company and thus, meeting the growing expenses.
Each year when company earns profits and then, it distributes its profits in the form of dividends, the balance remaining after paying the dividends is added to retained earnings.
Thus, the entire balance of these kind of profits not paid anywhere else and also not utilized is called retained earnings.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
Answer: $112.08
Explanation:
Given that,
Life insurance policy = $240,000
Cost = $210
Amount to be paid by company to old lady if she survives (A):
= $240,000 - $210
= $239,790
Probability that she survives (P1) = 0.999592
Probability that she doesn't survives (P2) = 1 - 0.999592
= 0.000408
Expected value of this policy for the insurance company:
= (P1 × cost of policy) - (P2 × A)
= 0.999592 × $210 - 0.000408 × $239,790
= $209.91432 - $97.83432
= $112.08
