The one word ending in -est which is spelled correctly is B) flattest.
A should be <em>silliest.
</em><em />C should be <em>sweetest.
</em><em />D should be <em>biggest.</em>
Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered in a specific and satisfactory way. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
An inference is a conclusion, that is, to perceive an inference about Mr. Dwerrihouse is to reflect on the facts and statements informed about him in the text and from these facts come to a conclusion about them. These facts can be the characteristics, the behavior of him on something and even the personality that he presents. How should you find these facts in your text and complete a statement about Mr. Dwerrihouse in order to answer your question.
The correct answer is asleep.
Grendel came to the castle at night, when most soldiers were asleep. That is why he was able to kill thirty of them, because they weren't aware of the fact that he was there. However, in the future, Beowulf and his soldiers only pretended to be asleep when in fact they were waiting for Grendel in order to kill him, which they did.
Answer:
Conflict is developed as the Shuttlesworths encounter opposition.
Explanation:
Based on the excerpt from We've Got a Job: The 1963 Children's March, it is narrated that Reverend and Mrs. Shuttlesworth and their two daughters were attacked by "a crowd of white men" as they arrived at an all-white school. The attackers were vicious as they hurt the family badly.
The part of the narrative structure that it S developed by the author in this excerpt is conflict as the Shuttlesworth family face opposition
Answer:
Dear Ms. Smith:
I have just finished serving the in-school suspension you assigned me on 11 February, 2021. As I told you when you assigned the punishment, I did not commit the vandalism done to the desk in Mr. Jones’ classroom. I realize this letter will not add any new facts to those on which you based your decision; therefore, it is unlikely to change your mind. I also understand that even if you do come to accept my assertion of innocence, you cannot undo the punishment. Nevertheless, I want to be heard.
The vandalized desk had my name carved into it. It was on that basis that Mr. Jones reported me. I understand why both you and Mr. Jones would suspect me. However, I was not the only person who sits at that desk or who had an opportunity to vandalize it. You asked me why anyone else would have carved my name on the desk. That is, in my view, an unfair question. I suggested that someone might have wanted to get me in trouble. Also, though I didn’t like to make the suggestion, I also thought someone might have carved my name because the person had feelings for me.
Though you made your skepticism clear, you brought in the other students who sit at the desk and asked them if they had done the damage. Each of them denied responsibility. Their denials, unlike mine, satisfied you. You didn’t address the possibility that someone might have come into the classroom and done the damage during a break or some other period when the classroom was empty.
I intend to put this incident behind me once I have delivered this letter to you. Writing my side of what happened is to give me closure.
Sincerely,
Explanation: