Indian merchants and industrialists support the civil disobedience movement because they wanted to import, make a profit, and have a conversion rate for rupees.
<h3>What is civil disobedience moment?</h3>
Civil disobedience moment means when a person wants to oppose something but in a peaceful manner.
The merchants and the industrialists wanted protection against the import that they were doing. The industrialists and the businesses wanted to earn more profit from what they made after World War I.
They also wanted that the government may allow them to establish some major industries. They also wanted to have a rate at which they can exchange rupees.
Learn more about civil disobedience, here
brainly.com/question/342503
#SPJ4
The opinion is <span>D. British taxes were unfair
Because of this opinion, rather than deciding to plan for independence, South Carolina's first continental congress resulted in them agreeing to boycott the Goods from British that started to take place in 1774 as a form of protest for the British Tax.</span>
Answer:
In the aftermath of the 1970s Watergate affair and a subsequent congressional inquiry led by Sen. Frank Church,[3] it was revealed that the NSA, in collaboration with Britain's GCHQ, had routinely intercepted the international communications of prominent anti-Vietnam War leaders such as Jane Fonda and Dr. Benjamin Spock.[4] Decades later, a multi-year investigation by the European Parliament highlighted the NSA's role in economic espionage in a report entitled 'Development of Surveillance Technology and Risk of Abuse of Economic Information', in 1999.[5]
Explanation:
please mark brainliest.also don't copy word for word so it doesn't get marked as plagiarized.
Answer:
A. A religion was first practiced
In the 1840s and 1850s there was a rising division as regards cultural and intellectual terms between the North and the South of the country. Between 1854 and 1861 a small civil war took part in Kansas. It was known as Bleeding Kansas and it was a series of violent civil confrontations between the ones who were in favour of the legality of slavery and the ones who were against it.