1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
3 years ago
15

Which best describes the Persians' rule?

History
1 answer:
Yuki888 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Ur answer is B)

Explanation:

They did not interfere with the daily lives of their subjects. Persians are Iranian people. They all speak modern Persian.

They did not interfere with the daily lives of their subjects.

Merciful rulers  

Monotheists

You might be interested in
According to the passage, President Abraham Lincoln's primary goal in fighting the Civil War was to A) advance the cause of Nort
marshall27 [118]

The reason that President Lincoln gave for fighting the Civil War was<u> B) use any </u><u>means necessary </u><u>to save the </u><u>Union</u><u>.</u>

<h3>President Lincoln's actions</h3>
  • President Lincoln tried to reassure the South that he would not end slavery.
  • Lincoln believed that the secession of the South States would lead to the destruction of the Union.

Lincoln therefore decided that the best way to protect the Union would be to bring the Southern States back into the fold by any mans necessary including force.

In conclusion, option B is correct.

Find out more on President Lincoln at brainly.com/question/12827866.

4 0
2 years ago
Did the new deal program allow banks to fail if they ran out
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

of money?

Explanation:

...

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The reason many people MOST LIKELY attacked the Emancipation Proclamation was because it....? EXPLAIN AS WELL
iragen [17]
The answer is A because many people attacked the Emancipation Proclamation because it allowed some states to continue to use slave labor. Border states such as Maryland and Delaware, which had remained loyal to the Union, were allowed to continue using slave labor, as were any states already under Union control.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is there a possible connection between document C and document B?​
dlinn [17]

The documents C and B may indeed be related to one another. So many invasions occurred. Another connection is that the soldiers abandoned their defense, which meant that they would not be able to repel the invaders.

  • There is a correlation because losing protection would make it harder for the soldiers to defeat the invaders if there were several invasions.
  • It's conceivable that Documents C and B are related because Document B claimed that because the soldiers were helpless and surrendered, fled and rendered their army hopeless, the adversaries would seize control and a populace invasion would fill the void. As a result, Document B serves as both a justification for Rome's demise and evidence in Document C, which also depicts the invasion.
  • The two documents are related to one another. They are related since they both involve the military. The reasons why the military disintegrated are discussed in document B. The invasion of Rome by the six tribes is discussed in document C. If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack.
  • This is due to the fact that documents B and C describe Rome's decline as a result of the invaders. It is explained in document B how the troops weakened themselves, and it is shown in document C together with a map of the empires that invaded Rome. My proof is found in B, where it states, "But when, due to carelessness and sloth, round drills were abandoned. This proof demonstrates the soldiers' slackness. Rome's invasions are depicted in C with lines, names, and dates. This proof provided me with the solution.
  • Given that they both compare how Rome's army declined, Document C and Document B may be related to one another. I discovered this information by looking through Doc B's search results and then observing how many different nations had attacked Doc C. When these sources discuss how many different nations Rome's soldiers faced without armor, they are compared.

To learn more about document C and document B visit:brainly.com/question/27215505

#SPJ9

5 0
2 years ago
Mutually assured destruction was a standing policy during the cold war, in which the united states and the ussr maintained and e
djverab [1.8K]
The idea of mutually assured destruction was a result of political and military tensions between the US and USSR. Both of these countries built up military technologies that were capable of killing millions of citizens in just a few minutes. Both countries wanted to be able to inflict a severe amount of damage on the other in case of an attack.

This is why the phenomenon of mutually assured destruction was created, as neither country wanted to unprepared if war was to break out between these two countries.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which of these ways is Islam similar to both Christianity and Judaism?
    14·2 answers
  • The dust bowl mainly affected the -------- region of the united states
    13·1 answer
  • What best describes the type of government proposed in the New Jersey plan
    14·1 answer
  • For each item listed, identify whether or not the national government under the Articles of Confederation had this power.
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast India &amp; Vietnam's independence movements in three sentences
    9·1 answer
  • What is the definition of cake
    6·1 answer
  • What did the 5,000 men involved with the civilian conservation corps (ccc) mainly focus on in Oklahoma
    6·2 answers
  • What peculiar teaching a confusion caused him to be resisted by the aristocrats
    14·1 answer
  • Cronus and Rhea were parents of which goddess?
    6·1 answer
  • Arrange the tiles in chronological order to show how events led to modern-day restrictions on voting rights.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!