Answer:
Explanation:
A capitalized cost of an asset is made up of
1 . Purchase price import duties and non refundable taxes less trade discount and rebate
2. Direct cost of bringing the asset to its present position
3. Fair value given in exchange for the the assets
Cost of Computer
Purchase Price - $10,000
Fair value of White common stock - $4,200
Installation cost - $ 700
Shipping cost - $ 500
Total Cost - $15,400
This can indicate fraud, duress, or undue influence.
In contracts, "consideration" is the things of value each side gives up in an exchange. So if one side gives $1 for a cup of coffee, that might be ok. Now, consider if the contract was to sell your entire house for $1! That would be a shockingly inadequate exchange because even the cheapest home is worth way more than $1.
In that case, the judge might look at <em><u>why</u></em> someone would be willing to give up so much for so little. Were they falsely told there home was worth nothing or maybe told that they would get $1 upfront and more later? That would be <u>fraud</u>. Were they told to sign the contract with a gun pointed at their head? That is an example of <u>duress</u>. Finally, did the person helping them with the contract have undue influence? If your boss, parent, or favorite celebrity advises you to do something that you don't want to do, but you worry about what they will thing if you don't, then you were a victim of their <u>undue influence. </u>
Answer:
e. the expected return on a security is positively and linearly related to the security's beta.
Explanation:
As per CAPM: Expected return (ER) = Rf + \beta (Rm - Rf)
Lets assume risk free return (Rf) as 5%, \beta as 2 and expected market return (Rm) as 10%
then, ER = 5% + 2 (10% - 5%) = 15%
However if lets assume all the other factors remain the same and \beta increases to 3
then, ER = 5% + 3 (10% - 5%) = 20%
Similarly if \beta reduces to 1
then, ER = 5% + 1 (10% - 5%) = 10%
So higher the \beta higher is the risk and hence higher the expected return. Hence expected return on a security is positvely and linearly related to the security's beta
<u>90% </u>of a manufacturer's profit and income comes from repeated purchases from returning customers.
<h3>What is Lifetime Customer Value (LCV)?</h3>
Lifetime Customer Value is the entire contribution of a customer to a brand or business enterprise over the course of their relationship.
It's an essential metric since keeping returning customers requires less than acquiring new ones, thus improving the value of your existing customers is an excellent strategy to generate growth and profit.
Therefore, we can conclude that <u>90% </u>of a manufacturer's profit and income comes from repeated purchases from returning customers.
Learn more about Lifetime customer value here:
brainly.com/question/26483324
Answer:
d.$38,448
Explanation:
The computation of the expected change in net income is shown below:
The net purchase for one day = $11,760
For 20 days excluding discount period i.e 10 days , it would be
= $11,760 × 20 days
= $235,200
The interest would be
= $235,200 × 10%
= $23,520
Now the gross purchase is
= (Net purchase × total number of days in a year) ÷ (1 - discount rate)
= ($11,760 × 365 days) ÷ (1 - 0.02)
= $4,292,400 ÷ 0.98
= $4,380,000
The discount is
= $4,380,000 × 0.02
= $87,600
After tax rate, the change in net income would be
= ($87,600 - $23,520) × (1 - tax rate)
= $64,080 × 0.60
= $38,448
