<span>The difference may lie in the project life, sometimes referenced as the planning horizon. A project may have a large internal rate of return (irr), but a very short project life. A second project might have a lower irr, but a much longer life. In that case, the second project will return less per year, but will provide a return for many more years, resulting in a higher pw.</span>
I would say that the question "How can markets be kept competitive" would not be important for a communist or socialist society as production would not be to meet a world capitalist market price but would be for fulfilling the basic necessities of the people like healthcare and education and food and clothing as well as for mutually beneficial trade with other countries on an equitable basis.
Answer:
Ophelia Inc.
Assuming that the company utilizes the allowance method, Ophelia should record a(n):
decrease in Accounts Receivable
Explanation:
This means that the accounts receivable will be credited while the allowance for doubtful accounts is debited to record the decreased value. The Patton Inc. account may not be recovered fully. However, the amount of the decrease depends on the amount that can be recovered from Patton. Thereupon, the accounts receivable will first be credited with the cash recovered with the corresponding debit entry in the Cash account.
<span>The fact that Ramon funds small businesses that he believes have the potential to grow large and when these companies are still in their initial stages and need investment, he buys their stocks at a low price and later sells them at higher prices when they are successful means that Ramon is a venture capitalist. The term venture capitalist in economics describes a person who i</span>nvests in a business venture, providing capital for start-up or expansion.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
