immanent is the opposite to the term transcendent.
In theological discourse, the terms transcendent and immanent frequently coexist. God is beyond human experience, perception, or understanding, according to the concept of transcendence. God is knowable, perceivable, and able to be grasped because of his immanence. For instance, because Jesus Christ is God incarnate (in the flesh), anybody who knew him, perceived of him, or experienced him by one or more of their five senses in the first century would have seen him as immanent.
Though Jesus Christ lived on earth, the Christian Worldview holds that God is transcendent and not impending. Because of his transcendence, God is different from and beyond what we can understand. The Triune God is bigger, greater, and more lovely than anything that humans can truly comprehend, even though Jesus lived among us.
Hence, option A is the correct answer
To learn more about transcendence here,
brainly.com/question/1265987
#SPJ4
Answer:
The source of public revenue comes in direct taxes, which includes income tax, wealth tax, and property tax, and in the form of indirect taxes, which includes goods and services tax and service tax.
Explanation:
<u><em>Hope this Helps! Please Mark Brainliest!</em></u>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It fulfills an important need in an industrial society
The correct answer is Lewis Henry Morgan
Recognized as one of the founders of modern scientific anthropology, Lewis Henry Morgan was the first to study kinship systems and devised an ambitious theory about man's cultural evolution.
Morgan developed a general theory of the cultural evolution of society, which would take place in three stages: savagery, barbarism and civilization, each marked by the predominance of certain techniques and institutions. The acquisition of a new technique or capacity would mark the end of one stage and the beginning of the next. Thus, the invention of ceramics started barbarism, and writing, civilization.
Although Morgan's theories have revealed themselves over time to be excessively linear and incomplete, his proposal of direct examination of primitive communities and the integration of different cultural, economic and historical factors lent anthropology rigor.
