I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. A process cost system would be more appropriate for a shampoo manufacturer. <span> A </span>process costing system<span> is used by companies that produce similar or identical units of product in batches employing a consistent process. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Calculate the predetermined overhead rate Overhead Rate per hour
Predetermined Overhead rate will be the estimated total manufacturing overhead divided by the estimated total direct labor hours. This will be:
= $ 921,600/51,200
= $ 18
(b) Calculate how much manufacturing overhead will be applied to production
Manufacturing overhead that'll be applied to production will be the predetermined overhead rate multiplied by the actual total direct labor hours. This will be:
= $ 18 × 48,900 direct labor hours
= $ 880,200
(c) Is overhead over- or underapplied? By how much?
The Actual Overhead Incurred = $902,900 while the manufacturing overhead applied = $880,200. This shows that overhead is underapplied due to the fact that manufacturing overhead applied is less than the actual overhead that is incurred.
Therefore, the amount of overhead that was underapplied will be:
= $ 902,900 - $ 880,200
= $ 22,700
(d) What account should be adjusted for over-or underapplied overhead? Should the balance be increased or decreased?
Based on the scenario in the question and the answers calculated, the cost of goods sold should be increased.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Creative strategy.
Explanation:
The creative strategy is the marketing plan a company sets to contribute to the achievement of its goal. Before this step, a study of the target market and customer of the company is necessary so the firm's publishers have an idea of who they are dealing with to introduce the good or service of the company in an engaging form.
Answer:
The interpretation of the particular question is outlined in the following segment on the clarification.
Explanation:
The facility was indeed 20 percent full by either the end of December 2017 therefore the 3,00,000 would still have been recognized as an expenditure.
The facility also seems to be 45 percent complete at either the end of 2018, meaning that the 3,75,000 will have been accepted as expenditures,
⇒ 
By most of the end of the decade, the financial sheet provides a snapshot 6,75,000 although this debt would be,
⇒ 
So 3,75,000 should have been shown as the cost of the rest in the financial information for 2018, as well as 6,75,000 would have been shown as contractual obligations.
Answer:
B) 20.0%
Explanation:
2005:
Sales: 15,000,000
COGS: (12,000,000)
SG&A: <u>(500,000)</u>
EBIT 2,500,000
2006:
Sales: 20,000,000
COGS: (16,000,000)
SG&A: <u>(1,000,0000)
</u>
EBIT 3,000,000
Growth rate = ((3,000,000 - 2,500,000) / 2,500,000 ) x 100 = (500,000 / 2,500,000 ) x 100 = 20%
