1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio [31]
2 years ago
11

HELP PLEASE When is something considered economic racism?

History
1 answer:
PSYCHO15rus [73]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option d) when it hurts the finances of people of color

Hope it helps ^^

You might be interested in
What the main cause of the french and indian war and how did it affect the colonies?
Thepotemich [5.8K]
The main cause of the French and Indian War is the superpower competition between Britain and France. ... The French and Indian War was fought between the two greatest powers on earth. The British and French had been rivals for a very long time in Europe. By 1754, the rivalry had followed them to North America.
7 0
2 years ago
What happened to tobacco in the mid-1700s?
PIT_PIT [208]
Tobacco was the most valuable cash crop produced in the 1700s until the invention of the cotton gin. Large quantities of it was produced rapidly.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which river was the border between Texas and Mexico after the war?
k0ka [10]
Your answer is rio grande 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did British Parlaiment meet with protests from the colonists int the years right after the French and Indian War
Bogdan [553]

In 1763, the British government emerged from the Seven Years' War burdened by heavy debts. ... The result was that the British Parliament passed the 1764 Currency Act which forbade the colonies from issuing paper currency. This made it even more difficult for colonists to pay their debts and taxes.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property. Dred Scot
erik [133]
DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.

These were their arguments.
<span>Dred Scott:
When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by
federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.</span><span>

Sandford:
To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.</span>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What offices did john marshall hold at the time of adams first appointed marbury justice of the peace?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Alfred the Great contribute to the development of a national identity in England?
    11·2 answers
  • In what two ways did World War I affect the women in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the name of the colony founded by a small group of Puritans?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the scientific revolution the enlightenment
    7·1 answer
  • Using information from the five articles, what are some examples of progress arising from the events of Westward Expansion that
    6·1 answer
  • What 3 powers do governors have over criminals? PLEASE HELP
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the British government consider control of Egypt critical to the<br> British Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of General Sherman's March to the Sea?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the influence of Catherine the Great on Russia?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!