Answer: $74.60
Explanation:
For people who are paid biweekly, 1 withholding allowance = $161.5
4 withholding allowances = $646
Earnings after deducting withholding allowance = $1,846 - $646
Earnings after deducting withholding allowance = $1,200
For a married person who is paid biweekly, the percentage applicable to David's pay bracket is 10% on the amount over the $454
That is, 10% on $746 ($1200 - $454)
=$74.60
Answer:
Case 1 = $9,420
Case 2 = 0
Explanation:
Determining the amount of impairment loss is given below:-
Case 1
Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value
= $41,640 - $32,220
= $9,420
Case 2
Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value
= 91,800 - $102,220
= 0
Since, the fair value is higher than Amortized cost so the value of Impairment loss in case 2 is 0.
The condition for which revenues are recognized even when the cash is collected in a different accounting period is;
- Services are provided even if cash has not yet been collected, in cases of accrual basis accounting
<h3>Revenue recognition</h3>
Two major forms of revenue recognition exist;
- When Cash is collected from customers. This is the case when the organisation uses cash basis accounting
- When services are provided even if cash has not yet been collected. This is the case when the organisation used accrual basis accounting
Read more on revenue recognition;
brainly.com/question/26274038
Answer:
"4"
Explanation:
Human relations approach to employees management believes that employees are not only motivated by financial incentives but other factors like praises , interpersonal relationship and delegation of roles and this in return , boost their commitment.
The managers are involved in active support of employees' growth and performance.
It underscores the importance interpersonal and social relationship in a work environment.
I believe the answer is: Enable phase
During the enable phase, a company would evaluate the progess and determine additional planing necessary to ensure that the operation run smoothly. Often times, transferring responsibilities to another organization that had larger jurisdiction would be seen as a more appropriate decision.
