Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Because with the fire the paleolithic people cooked their food as well as hardened their armor and weaponry. <span />
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
because in amazon rainforest has high humidity
They were mad because <span> British continued transgressing against the Native American homeland, butchering erratic tournament, and pushing the Native Americans outside of their headquarters.</span>
