Any speech that is made with the intention of inciting a violent and unlawful uprising against the administration is called a seditious speech. Such utterances may call for a rebellion against government institutions or its military, thus jeopardizing the internal security of the country.During World War I, Charles Schenck, the leader of the American Socialist Party, attempted to dissuade freshly-drafted soldiers in the US army from serving, by distributing thousands of pamphlets that claimed only the 'ruling classes' would benefit from their sacrifices. While Schenck was charged by the government in 1919, for violating the Espionage Act, which forbade interference in military recruitment, he appealed to the Supreme Court, saying that his right to free speech granted by the First Amendment, was being denied. Finally, the Court ruled in favor of the government, stating that the right to free speech was not limitless, and Schenck's actions had the potential to cause 'clear and present danger' to the administration, which Congress had the right to prevent.
Answer:
C. They had no intentions of recolonizing the Americas.
Explanation:
A. is wrong as well as D.
European powers did not seek to recolonize the Western Hemisphere
Monarchs were offended by Monroe's bold statement.
Answer:
A) Power is held by an economic elite, the people who control the ''means of production''
Explanation:
Karl Marx openly criticized the capitalist system. He was on the opinion that the workers are manipulated by the people in power, and that they were doing that very wisely in order to be able to retain their power, and even gain more of it. According to Marx this was done through the means of production. There was not many people that controlled the means of production, but it was an economic elite that had them all under its control. Because they had the means of production, it meant that they had all of the jobs in the industries under their influence, and through it, they had power over the workers. Marx thought that this is not the right way to function, but that the means of production and the overall control of the society and the power in it should be in the people, not just few elitists.
