1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
3 years ago
13

People on either side of the smartphones-for-teens debate can't agree on the evidence. Sure, there's proof of cyber bullying. Th

ere's also proof of educational benefits. Yet nothing is conclusive, so no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens. Anyone supporting such a restriction is naïve and uniformed. He or she is reacting from emotion instead of using his or her brain to study all the evidence and make a decision specific to his or her own teen. The bottom line is it's up to parents to be parents. Why spend billions of dollars on trying to stop cyber bullying or explore educational apps? It's probably just another human assumption that we can control the technology we've created. Trying is a waste of time and money.
Which of the following is true about this argument excerpt?

a)It is respectful in tone to the audience and supports its claim with specific, credible evidence.
b)It contains specific, credible evidence but uses a disrespectful tone that should be edited.
c) It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
d)It uses a respectful tone but needs specific, credible evidence to support the claim.
English
2 answers:
Ratling [72]3 years ago
8 0
C. The text provides opinion with no evidence, and is disrespectful by saying people who support the ban of smartphones are not using their brain, and calling them "naive and uninformed".
Fudgin [204]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.

Explanation:

When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.

In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.

He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?

He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.

After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.

The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.

-X *heart*

You might be interested in
Why does the myth explain that each tribe has its own gift?
posledela

Answer:

The myth explained that each tribe has its own gifts as given to them by Enkai the creator in order to help each of them succeed and prosper in their different habitations.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What was Martin Luther King Jr I have a dream overall impression
Naddik [55]
I loved it, it was an amazing speech
8 0
3 years ago
What can characterization reveal to the reader? A. The fears and motivations of the characters B. The central conflict the chara
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

D) When and where the story takes place

Explanation:

Hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
What is the speaker suggesting in the line below from Walt Whitman's poem "song of myself"? i bequeath myself to the dirt to gro
azamat

I believe that the answer is his body will become a part of the earth, because 'bequeath' means to pass something on or leave to someone else, and he is leaving his body and letting it become one with the earth.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you use wheelchair in a sentence
Vesna [10]
After a verb i guess, but im pretty sure this is a trick question
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence uses passive voice? We arrived early for our annual dental check-ups. Dr. Gomez greeted us warmly and took X-rays
    5·2 answers
  • Is a dog a cat or is a dog a wolf or a coyote or a fox or Is a husky a wolf​
    15·2 answers
  • What quality of the locomotives does the consonance of the s and sh sounds in the sentence below suggest? I hear the locomotives
    6·2 answers
  • Which tactic was not used to keep blacks from exercising their civil rights in the post-Civil War South? A. poll taxes B. Jim Cr
    13·2 answers
  • What is a word that has eat and means to say over
    9·2 answers
  • "Gandhi Defends His Beliefs" concludes with a _____. Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Which answer best summarizes the nature of relations between the two countries prior to the attacks? (5 points)
    14·1 answer
  • Question you know how people be adding pictures on the side of your answer how do you do that... ill give brainliest to any one
    12·2 answers
  • What is the cardio plate hooked up to?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the shrine imagery used by Juliet and Romeo
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!