1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
3 years ago
13

People on either side of the smartphones-for-teens debate can't agree on the evidence. Sure, there's proof of cyber bullying. Th

ere's also proof of educational benefits. Yet nothing is conclusive, so no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens. Anyone supporting such a restriction is naïve and uniformed. He or she is reacting from emotion instead of using his or her brain to study all the evidence and make a decision specific to his or her own teen. The bottom line is it's up to parents to be parents. Why spend billions of dollars on trying to stop cyber bullying or explore educational apps? It's probably just another human assumption that we can control the technology we've created. Trying is a waste of time and money.
Which of the following is true about this argument excerpt?

a)It is respectful in tone to the audience and supports its claim with specific, credible evidence.
b)It contains specific, credible evidence but uses a disrespectful tone that should be edited.
c) It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
d)It uses a respectful tone but needs specific, credible evidence to support the claim.
English
2 answers:
Ratling [72]3 years ago
8 0
C. The text provides opinion with no evidence, and is disrespectful by saying people who support the ban of smartphones are not using their brain, and calling them "naive and uninformed".
Fudgin [204]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.

Explanation:

When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.

In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.

He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?

He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.

After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.

The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.

-X *heart*

You might be interested in
Why is it important to stand up for what you believe in? What are the positive outcomes when people do?
Naily [24]

Answer:

Sticking up for what you believe in builds your self- respect because you're following through with your values. Going against what you believe in just because it's more convenient is less than admirable. Standing your ground also gains respect from others, even if they view things differently than you

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whats a octave in poetry
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

An octave is a verse form consisting of eight lines of iambic pentameter (in English) or of hendecasyllables (in Italian).

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the sentence, what do you think avaricious means?
podryga [215]

Answer:

Greedy

Explanation:

The word in itself essentially means greed. Hope this helped!

7 0
3 years ago
How does odysseus survive the dangers posed by the sirens scylla and charybdis.
Sauron [17]

Answer:

he gives his crew wax to put in their ears and has them tie him to the ship, giving them strict orders to not untie him.

6 0
2 years ago
Make up dialogue.Use the words from the box.
Travka [436]
Pets are reliable friends to owners needing companionship. Doctors need to consider that a pet is most likely to lower blood pressure and stress in a patient. Pets need to suffer from lack of attention and shelters can provide homes by partnering with those that use a pet.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • BRAINLIEST According to Benjamin Franklin, why doesn’t it make a difference if we have a reason for doing something or not?
    10·2 answers
  • What does Edward Abbey believe will happen if the dam is shut down and the reservoir is drained? A. The Colorado River will floo
    10·2 answers
  • Consider what it means to be a hero today and the traits and behaviors of King Arthur, Don Quixote, and Sundiata in the stories
    15·1 answer
  • What happens when the boy who survived the explosion abroad a steamboat returns to town?
    11·1 answer
  • Name as many latten roots as you know. Then please list their meaning.
    13·1 answer
  • Have you ever experienced racism? My answer is no but idk how to write it I need help. I’ll make you as brainiest
    6·2 answers
  • Samantha is writing a report about military technology from the 1700s and 1800s. She will collect information about the military
    13·2 answers
  • Think of a better and more effective idea to dispose garbage. Write a report.​
    13·1 answer
  • Write an essay stating your position on whether people are forced to do things because of social pressures.​
    6·1 answer
  • Help now please!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!