Minor critique that could easily be ignored, instead of “Of course you do.” perhaps “Of course you would.” would sound better? that’s just my opinion and i think this is very good writing. i’m not sure what the context to it is, but i enjoyed it.
☁️<u>My Answer☁️:</u>
The piece of evidence that supports the situational irony of the poem is C: Its sculptor well those passions read.
There are several ways in which scientists attempt to eliminate mistakes and fake results from their research. For example, the use of the scientific method allows scientists to experiment (in most cases), which allows them to see whether their results can be replicated in real life.
Another method is through peer-reviewing systems for scholarly review. This means that scientists check each other's work to make sure it meets some quality standards. Also, it is a way to stop incomplete or erroneous information from spreading.
The answer for this question is<em> B)</em>... Hope it helps have a great day everyone :)
The answer is the last one, D. All of the other transitions indicate that the writer will either go into further detail on the subject or list other reasons as to why this would be correct. However, D clearly uses a contrasting transition to introduce a new argument.
