It showed that the us could no longer stay in isolationism and it was to be probably the biggest influence in international affairs. When the us won ww2 and faced off with the soviet union it also showed that the us was the biggest world superpower.
If you are referring to the 1930s I don't think Churchill had a clear strategy of the kind that you suggest. He would have opposed most breaches of the Treaty of Versailles, which it is unclear what he would have done if Hitler had defied British protests. Most of Hitler's early aims focused on Eastern Central Europe, where British influence at the time was almost nil.
Answer:
The town grew under the influence of<u> colonialism.</u>
Hope this helps :)
The reason why the Fugitive Slave Law and the Dred Scott decision made Black Abolitionists take more direct action against slavery because it meant that those who escaped slavery were at risk of being taken back.
<h3>How did Abolitionists react to the Fugitive slave law?</h3><h3 />
When the Fugitive Slave Law was passed, Black Abolitionists were outraged because it meant that people who escaped slavery in the South, could be captured from the North and taken back to slavery.
This was also the case with the Dred Scott decision which ruled that Black people could not sue for their freedom. Black Abolitionists then engaged in more direct action against slavery to ensure that people who escaped slavery would be free forever.
Find out more on the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 at brainly.com/question/16683622
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
Expansion and centralization encourages disadvantaged groups to come together and resist State attempts to promote new policies to these groups. These groups, feeling devalued and threatened by centralization and expansion, whether at the social, political or economic level, they feel that they need to defend themselves in their local environments. Several examples of this can be cited as the Cossack revolt, the Pueblo revolt and the resistance of the Brazilian quilombola communities.
