Answer:
No this was not the case for me and I was not aware that it was a good idea to have the opportunity to speak to the
The national, Provincial and Local level government
Answer:
ion even know those are questions i should have in my mind thxs alot XD
Explanation:
Answer:
A withholding of income taxes and contributions to other federal funds
Explanation:
Taxation can be defined as the involuntary or compulsory fees levied on individuals or business entities by the government to generate revenues used for funding public institutions and activities.
In order to ensure that, all employees pay taxes on the income earned throughout the year, the internal revenue service (IRS) has made it compulsory and mandatory for all employers to make available a W-2 Form to all their employees, so as to enable these employees fill out the total amount of wages, how much income tax is to be withheld from their respective paycheck in relation to their filing status and how much was paid as tax the previous year. Therefore, a W-2 form is used by an employer to report the wages paid to each employee, calculate how much tax should be withheld from his or her employee's paycheck and submitted to the internal revenue service (IRS).
Additionally, any employee who defaults in the payment of his or her income tax would be faced with stiff penalties such as failure-to-file, paying a fine etc.
This ultimately implies that, employers must comply with federal and state tax laws requiring withholding of income taxes for their employees and contributions to other federal funds.
Answer:
<u>possibly</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. <em>In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.</em>