Answer :
On January 6, 2021 a large riot had gathered and stormed the capitol building to protest against the presidency. At the same time as the rioters were entering the capitol building, congress and lawmakers were inside counting the votes for this past election. The capitol were not prepared for the rioting, and had little law enforcement there to stop such a large group.
As the rioters walked up the steps of the building, officers were there trying to resist the group, but didn’t have the manpower necessary. This led to the people being able to overpower law enforcement and walk into the building, forcing their way into the capitol. Reinforcement was called, the national guard showing up a while after, and standing on guard to keep watch on the capitol building after the fact.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer Some signs of impaired drivers are improper lane use, failure to signal, or unpredictable stopping and swerving of the car. These are just some of the signs that a driver may be impaired if you do see these signs on the road try to keep as much space possible between you and the car who demonstrates these signs.
Explanation:
Answer:
This question is missing the Tom's marginal tax rate.
So, I assume it will be 35%
ATRR= 0.052; 8yrs: 187,514, 20yrs: 344,528
Explanation:
ATRR = (.08 x (1 - 0.35) = 0.052 ;
8yrs = $125,000 x (1.052)^8 = 187,514
20yrs = $125,000 x (1.052)^20 = 344,528
Answer:
The two party system is possibly hurting America because of the limit on choice. When there are only two parties the American people are almost forced to decide between them. Some Americans feel that neither party full represent their values or principles. This leaves alienated voters and not true representation of our countries values. In our Constitutional Republic, true representation matters and without it I believe it is hurting America.
Explanation:
