1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notka56 [123]
2 years ago
12

How is a murder reported in georgia?

Law
1 answer:
Tom [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

UCR data presented in this annual report is compiled directly from summary offense and arrest reports submitted from Georgia's law enforcement agencies.

Does this help?

You might be interested in
True or False: All government exists to control the legitimate exercise of power.
natka813 [3]

Answer:True

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Justify the title of the poem?<br>the leader and the led<br>​
OLga [1]

Answer:

The title of the poem The Leader and the Led by Niyi Osundare speaks to the various dimensions of attitude within the ambit of Leadership.

It speaks to the indivisible union between leadership and followership.

In the first line, he opens up the poem by describing the attribute of the Leader as a lion who is unafraid to stake his claim. He contrasts that with the Antelope who is always fearful and reminded of the paws of the Lion.

It speaks therefore to the requirement of the Leader to be strong when he or she has to be. It also indicates that the leader cannot always be nice.

By an Ironic statement in line 9, he points out the reason why a duplicitous person cannot lead. He likens such a person to a Zebra. Duplicity equals the inability to inspire trust. Trust is an essential and critical quality for a leader. In line 10 he communicates that the followers are not as powerless as they have been painted to be in line 6 as fearful Impalas, for they also have the ability to finger the flaws of a leader to limelight and remove their following from he or she.

Lines 19 and 20 suffices in the description of a balanced leader as one who must be firm when it is required and gentle when the occasion calls for it.

The entire imagery painted by the poem is a fine depiction of leadership using metaphorical analogies of the animal kingdom.

For as in the animal kingdom, animals have leadership and following, so also do humans.

7 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME!!!
allsm [11]

Answer:you should if you want to it’s about what you and you girl(if you have a girl) but make sure you have time to spend with you dad mother and you girl and daughter or son be sure not to over work your self also save money up for a house and the things you like food ask for help if you need help with money for paying for things you need once you get settle buy the things you want but don’t spend all you money or your not going to have money to pay your bills and stuff

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Small businesses carry a higher burden for regulation cost then large corporations because _____
Free_Kalibri [48]
The answer to the question is c
6 0
2 years ago
A frivolous lawsuit is a case without merit, sometimes filed in an effort to force the defendant to offer a cash settlement rath
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

There are few things managers dread more than litigation. Even petty cases have a way of damaging relationships, tarnishing reputations, and eating up enormous sums of money, time, and talent. Most managers know that lawsuits are steadily increasing. Smart managers know that they are also increasingly avoidable. There are now many alternatives to litigation that can nip lawsuits in the bud, resolve long-standing disputes, and even produce win-win solutions to old and bitter fights that would otherwise only leave both sides damaged.

U.S. corporations pay more than $20 billion a year to litigation attorneys—an alarming fact that distracts our attention from other and often more important business costs of litigating our disputes. Lawyers’ fees and other direct costs get the most attention because they’re easy to measure. But the indirect business costs of litigation, the cost of diverting key personnel from productive activities, for example, or the cost of destroying a profitable relationship with a former business ally, are perhaps equally important. From the company’s perspective, they may be more important.

The high cost of resolving disputes has several causes, but the most important is the mind-set established and nurtured by the adversary system. The essence of this system is that lawyers for opposing parties have the responsibility to present every piece of evidence and make every legal argument that might possibly benefit their clients. Pretrial discovery and other litigation procedures are designed to leave no stone unturned in the search for relevant evidence. By training, temperament, professional duty, and frequently by client expectation, attorneys tend to exploit these procedures to the fullest and to persevere as long as any hope remains. In fact, each lawyer has an obligation to be as zealous an advocate as possible, even—sometimes especially—to the detriment of discovering the truth and of resolving conflicts to the satisfaction of both parties.

The idea behind the adversary system is that the truth will emerge when opposing sides present their cases as aggressively as possible. Even though this ideal is not always realized, the principle is probably sound. The problem with the adversary method in civil cases is not theoretical but practical. First, it is not the most effective way to resolve some kinds of disputes. Second, it can be made more effective for most kinds of disputes by borrowing certain of the nonadversarial features of other forms of dispute resolution. Third, from both the societal and the individual perspective, we may no longer be able to afford it in its undiluted form.

Alternatives to traditional litigation have been around for many years, but Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a formal technique and an accepted business practice emerged in the 1970s.

The ADR Mind-Set

Judge Dorothy Nelson of the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco traveled to Israel several years ago to study the laws of divorce as administered by different religious groups. In Jerusalem she attended a court hearing conducted by three Greek Orthodox priests in long black robes and long white beards. Court was conducted in a Quonset hut with paint peeling from the walls, furnished only with a plain wooden table and chairs. A wife was suing her husband for divorce. As her lawyer rose to his feet holding a handful of papers from which to plead her case, he was waved gently aside by the presiding priest, who turned to the wife and asked her to tell her own story.

She explained that for five years of marriage she had shared a house with her mother-in-law. The older woman, too old to climb stairs, occupied the ground floor, and the wife lived upstairs. Since there was only one entrance to the house, she had to enter through her mother-in-law’s living quarters to get to her own, and her mother-in-law continually questioned her about her activities and offered unsolicited advice. She loved her husband, she said, but the situation was intolerable.

The wife sat down and the presiding priest, waving aside the husband’s lawyer as he had the wife’s, asked to hear the husband’s side of the case. The husband said that he loved his wife but also his mother. As a Christian he felt responsibility for both, but he was a poor man and could not afford two households.

The three priests retired by stepping into the dusty street outside and returned five minutes later with their judgment. The husband was to purchase a ladder. When the wife wanted to avoid her mother-in-law, she could climb the ladder directly to her second-floor window.

Judge Nelson says that as she watched husband and wife leave the Quonset hut hand in hand, she could only wonder what might have happened to this couple under an adversary system, with its orders to show cause, its lengthy hearings, and its high attorney fees.

<em>H</em><em>O</em><em>P</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em>T</em><em> </em><em>H</em><em>E</em><em>L</em><em>P</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>Y</em><em>O</em><em>U</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The role of the United States Marshals was based on the role of _____. A. the town crier B. early colonial watches C. the sherif
    12·1 answer
  • Morgan bought a truck with a loan. this means they:
    10·2 answers
  • . Why do you think forensic scientists are so careful that the tests they do are sensitive, reproducible, and specific? What mig
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·1 answer
  • You are driving along the interstate highway headed for a ballgame in a nearby city. A state highway patrol car suddenly appears
    15·1 answer
  • The policy framework and guidelines for community policing state that you should consider 13 interrelated elements to understand
    9·1 answer
  • Help?? brainliest for first answer?
    15·1 answer
  • Which amendment outlaws cruel and unusual punishment
    15·1 answer
  • How did saul become king
    8·2 answers
  • ***50 POINTS+BRAINLEST***
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!