Answer:
I agree with the answer of curiosity.
Explanation:
I haven't read the book, but doing a quick search I found this: "It is hard to say whether Saki himself takes a stance on curiosity, but he makes it clear that it is an integral part of childhood, especially in developing how children interact with adults and understand the world around them."
Because the author makes a stance that curiosity is an integral part of childhood, I agree with the selected answer in the image.
- repetition is definitely one, there are lots are parts that repeat but the last two lines are an example
- hyperbole in parts like "just like we always talked about" bc they didn't literally always talk about
- assonance, i believe not 100% on this one, in the red lights stop signs part bc the 's' sound repeats
- rhyme is also in there like the two lines "who always made me doubt" and "she's everything i'm insecure about"
if these don't work let me know and i'll try to find more !
hope this helps !!
STEP 1
Describe the work and its creator in the first paragraph. Do not assume that readers know the work or author, so place the work in context. Ask yourself if the text is a first outing for the author or the latest in a long series. Does the author have a reputation or expertise in a certain field? Is the work controversial or well-known or little-known, and why? Describe the intended audience for the work.
STEP 2
Write an accurate summary of the work’s main ideas in the second paragraph. Do not mingle your evaluation with the summary. Merely explain the most important ideas the author tried to convey in the entire work.
STEP 3
Judge the author’s presentation in the third paragraph. Did the author present accurate and relevant data in a logical manner? Did the author clearly define important terms or jargon? Did the author offer sound interpretations? Focus, in this paragraph, on whether the author achieved his or her purpose for creating the work.
STEP 4
State both your agreement and disagreement with the author in the fourth paragraph. Develop your ideas by explaining why you agree and disagree with the author’s ideas. Cite other critics who support your interpretation.
STEP 5
Compose the conclusion, often the shortest paragraph in the critique. Restate the main agreements and objections to the work. In the closing, do not mention any new idea that does not appear.in the body paragraphs. The final paragraph gives an overview of the entire essay by restating its main ideas.
"Yet every one of these disasters has actually happened somewhere, and many real communities have already suffered a substantial number of them. A grim specter has crept upon us almost unnoticed, and this imagined
tragedy may easily become a stark reality we all shall know."
Okay. I try my hardest:)
The girl picked the flowers by the lake.-- Positive and regular
He showed me that the machine wouldn't work. --Negative and regular
I drank out of the cup.--Negative and irregular
The machine made homes for everyone.--Positive and irregular
I hope you do well on that test.--Negative and irregular.
<span>Fata a ales florile de lac și regulate .-- Pozitivă
El mi-a arătat Mașina care nu ar funcționa. --Negative Și regulată
Am băut din cupa și neregulate .-- Negativ
Mașina de făcut pentru toată lumea .-- case pozitive și neregulate
Sper să fac bine pe și negative .-- acel test neregulat.
</span>
<span>sper ca asta ajuta:)
</span>
I hope this helps:)
