Answer:
1. go,2. answer. 3 repaired, 4. wash. 5 waiting, being. 6. being recognized. 7 teaching. 8 . to see. hope it helps
Explanation:
mark me brainliest please. thanks
The paragraph is beyond choppy and uncomfortable to read because of it. There are too many short sentences and not enough complex ones, making it hard to follow any kind of flow the paragraph has the potential to offer. Because there were no transitions of any kind, it was hard to try and smoothly combine topics. For example, the first two sentences seem abrupt and confusing standing on their own like that. The narrator went from loving swimming to randomly speaking about the beach, and it was hard to follow until you got to the end of the second sentence, understanding then where the connection was between the two. It is hard to even figure out if the paragraph is about swimming or about the beach, and nothing was incorporated smoothly.
There are tons of things to do at local beaches, and people should spend more time at them instead of hanging out indoors all day. The beach offers a place to develop strong swimming skills, and learning to swim is one of my happiest childhood memories. I am glad I learned to swim at the beach.
Rearranging the way beaches and a love for swimming were introduced allow for it to be more easy to understand.
Answer:
<u>Prehistoric people could not record history</u>, for <u>they had not invented writing</u>.
Explanation:
Compound sentences are sentences that consist of at least two independent clauses connected by a semicolon or a coordinating conjunction preceded by a comma.
Independent clauses are clauses that can stand alone as a sentence. This means that they contain all elements a sentence should contain (a subject and predicate) and express a complete thought.
The given compound sentence consists of two independent clauses connected by the conjunction <em>for</em>:
- <u>Prehistoric people</u> could not record history.
- <u>They </u>had not invented writing.
In case you need to identify the subjects and predicates as well, I've pointed them out. The subjects are underlined, and the predicates are written in bold letters.
I've read the paragraph and have an idea of what would be the bold sentence.
I've concluded that the only possible and reasonable is the first one is the third (hook) since the 13 - year - old was sad for the loss of his parents.
Hope it helped,
Happy homework/ study/ exam!
The correct answer is B. It focuses on facts about mush without including Douglass's own opinion of it.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, Douglass provides information about the way children and adults were feed as they were all slaves. Moreover, in this text, Douglass mainly describes the food called "mush" and the way this was provided without including his opinion or feelings about this. This can be seen in ideas such as "was coarse corn-meal boiled" or "set down upon the ground". This characteristic makes the text to be objective as there is a focus on facts and the personal opinion of the author is not included. According to this, the correct answer is B.