1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
damaskus [11]
3 years ago
6

Explain the political impact of personalist leaders

History
1 answer:
-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Understanding the political dynamics within authoritarian systems such as ... In the absence of mobilizing ideologies, modern autocratic leaders abuse ... The implications of authoritarian rule do not stop at the water's edge.

Explanation:

hope this helps

You might be interested in
How long has it been for awhile has been longer year
Bogdan [553]
Hmm? Agg gg ajfhsk siehdbeo
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summary Paragraph - Make a final summary judgment of Jackson. Overall, did he move the country
alexandr402 [8]

The summary is that Jackson moved the country towards democracy by increasing voting rights.

<h3>What is a summary?</h3>

It should be noted that a summary simply means a concise information about an event or happening.

In this case, the summary is that Jackson moved the country towards democracy by increasing voting rights. This was done by lowering property requirements and this was called the Jacksonian Democracy.

In conclusion, he did in all areas and led to more common people voting.

Learn more about summary on:

brainly.com/question/24858866

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLLSSS HELP I NEED THIS QUIZ DONE SUPER QUICK
maksim [4K]

Answer:

Which sentence from the passage shows that the function of the river depicted here has carried through to modern times?

Explanation:

Which sentence from the passage shows that the function of the river depicted here has carried through to modern times?

5 0
2 years ago
What best Describes the Great Compromise? * A decision that most favored the larger states A decision that most favored the smal
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the indian trade affect the war?​
gladu [14]
Exports rise more to China than to US, says SBI. The bank has suggested the Export Refinance Scheme to be reintroduced by the Reserve Bank of India in INR and foreign currency. While overall exports to US grew by 9.46% to $52.4 billion in FY19, for China the growth was 25.6% to $16.7 billion.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ) what was the essence of thurgood marshall's argument in the supreme court in brown vs. the board of education? what was the co
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Radical Republicans seek harsh punishment against former Confederate States?
    14·1 answer
  • What best describes the united states at the begunning of the twetieth century
    8·1 answer
  • What did the founders mean when they wrote "to form a more perfect Union"? A military would be formed to protect against foreign
    7·2 answers
  • What was the solution to the issue of if the states should have equal
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is most likely to be found in a daily rather than a periodical?
    8·1 answer
  • Why does Caesar get angry at Metellus
    6·1 answer
  • Plz now i need it now
    5·2 answers
  • Were there more of advantage or disadvantage of colonization?​
    10·1 answer
  • What are the goals of all terrorists groups, regardless of ideology? Check all that apply.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!