Answer:
A problem for the absolute rulers was the rise of parliament. A way the rulers could have dealt with this is to bribe the parliament or to have a inside man in the parliament.
Explanation:
Answer:
negative punishment
Explanation:
Punishment (positive or negative) decreases the chances that a particular behavioral reoccurs.
Handing a prison sentence to anyone that offends the laws of the state is an example of negative punishment based on available research. This is because, serving a prison sentence makes it more likely that the convict will commit the same crime again.
While many experts in criminal justice have observed that many ex-convicts tend to re-offend, the principles of positive punishment for convicts have been set out by Peter B. Wood in his paper titled "Exploring the Positive Punishment Effect Among Incarcerated Adult Offenders
"; American Journal of Criminal Justice 31(2):8-22; 2007; .
In his submission;
<em> "As the U.S. has pursued a policy of mass imprisonment for nearly three decades, now boasts the highest incarceration rate in the world and returns nearly 800,000 ex-convicts into our communities each year, more attention to this issue is called for-particularly since it could be argued that, for many offenders, criminal justice punishments promote future offending."</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
They both are right especially during the time of their presidency. Thomas Jefferson believed that a strong federal government proved itself to be a necessity although he probably didn't like the idea at all. After all the founding fathers tried the Articles of Confederation (ratified 1781) and found out that it didn't really work.
Eight years later, they wrote the constitution that we currently live under. The federal government was given a lot more power which it needed. That doesn't mean it was fully embraced. Just that it was the next step. If anything, for all Jefferson's idealism, he was a pragmatist. If it worked, do it and be content.
====================
Lincoln saw the whole situation quite differently. The Civil War began with the underlying cause of state's rights. Later on (1863), Lincoln turned to the question of slavery. There was a hole even in the 1789 Constitution and that hole came back to haunt everyone. The question was individual rights. Slaves. The south could not easily survive without slave labor and because slaves were expensive, they were more or less humanely treated. After the Civil War, their condition was a nightmare. Lincoln address the entire question of what was missing in the constitution although he did not bring any amendments to correct what he knew had to be corrected. He may have done so if he was not murdered. As it was it was left to Johnson to bring in the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery.
Slave traders viewed humans lives as dogs. Because slave traders only wanted humans to work for them and do there dirty work. They did not think anything of there value of life.
