<span>On the year 1700, England’s conditions were more on
Agricultural revolution where people learned farming methods such as crop
rotation, stock breading, farms being brought by the rich people. Thus was the
time when the open fields were closed and food and lifestyle improved as well
as the population. 1800 is geared towards industrial revolution. A time where
factories and steam engines were made. Unlike agriculture, middle class
participated more creating a steady governance. However there was also issue on
overwork, hazardous equipements and facilities, malnutrition and starvation.</span>
I think it is not because it is not
It created awareness of the Mauryan Empire in other countries.
One of the most basic human rights is the right to live and a government has a duty to protect the lives of its people.
In other words, it should not harm people because of their religious beliefs, race, or any other attributes about them.
Now, when a nation does not value its people's right to live, tensions start growing really fast and lives are at risk. A perfect example of this was during World War II when the Nazi government killed nearly 6 million Jews which we know as the holocaust which is a systematic way of killing a group. In addition, there were about 1.5 million Armenians that died in the early 1900s when they were targeted by the government of Turkey. Both of these examples are genocides that violate the right to live and also other rights as well such as freedom of torture, rights to basic needs, etc...
