Answer:
An appurtenant easement - True.
Explanation:
'Appurtenant easement' is illustrated as the legal right or easement to use the neighboring parcel of land that runs with the land. It allows the owners to access to adjoining land that runs with the owned property.
As per the question, 'an appurtenant easement' would be the right type of access rights that would grant Anna protection against the prospective purchaser. It would <u>help her get the access to use the 500 feet parcel land that runs with her 50 acres of owned land and retain her authority over the frontage by providing access to lot owners.</u> Therefore, the 'appurtenant easement' right would be considered <u>true</u> to grant the protection of her rights.
In some research, the researchers are not able to use random assignments to divide participants among groups. Instead, they compare preexisting groups, which results in a quasi-experimental design.
Random assignments are those which are given as a matter of chance to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all participants. Here participants forming multiple groups are with similar characteristics. So all groups are the same at the start of the experiment.
A quasi-experimental design applies a non-random method, and subjects are assigned to preexisting groups. There are some situations where true experiments can't be used for practical reasons. In such cases, a quasi-experimental design is a suitable tool.
To learn more about quasi experimental design here
brainly.com/question/28145500
#SPJ4
free speech
Explanation:
They let you have freedom, and let you speak whatever is on your mind
This was actually a very smart behaviour. This way the law was accessible to everyone so on one hand, noone could say "I didn't know" and on the other hand it could be used for reference by anyone and people would not need to seek council in every matter. This also decreased the possibility to abuse power (if the law was only accessible to few, those few could abuse their power by manipulating it in their favour).
The theocricy
is what i think