Johnny most likely wouldn't have turned himself in because he knew the other boys would react incredibly depressed. Johnny holds the group together and is the weakest. They feel as if they need to protect him, but if he gets sent to prison, then they would feel like they failed him.
If he was a soc, he most likely would've cared less since they're rich. They would possibly be able to pay him out of jail time.
It would matter because he wouldn't have to worry if he was a soc. But he's a greaser, and he has a group that feels the need to be his guardians.
In today's world, murder isn't exactly able to be payed out of. If he was a soc in jail for murder, it would be extremely popular on social media or the news since he would be coming from a rich family. If he was a soc that committed murder, it would matter less, but it would increase the already-bad reputation of the greasers and the people living in that area.
The answer is:
because they are powerful calls to change that define their causes
According to the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Sentiments, American citizens are acknowledged and have the right to put an end to harmful methods of government. As a result, both Jefferson and Stanton authorize people to take action when their freedom, security and contentment are at risk.
The answer to your question would be direct and approval. You can rule out all the options that have affection and focus on the ones that have approval. You have to choose between extrinsic and direct. Ask yourself, which one makes more sense? Plug in the words to see if any make sense and find the answer. Hope this helps!
