The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
I would think money,supply or demand?
The SG&A Expense/Sales is the tertiary ratio that drives profitability.
<h3>What is
SG&A Expense/Sales?</h3>
This refers to the everyday operating expenses of running a business that are not included in the production of goods or delivery of services.
As the SG&A includes rent, salaries, advertising, marketing expenses etc., it is the tertiary ratio that drives profitability.
Therefore, E is correct.
Read more about SG&A
brainly.com/question/26752234
#SPJ1
I will not be able to illustrate the graph in the dialog box but instead, the writer will describe the long-run equilibrium of transnet. Long-run equilibrium in economics focuses on the period of time where the resource is still available and what is its costs and quantity produced.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Choosing less harmful products.
Explanation:
Everyday companies are growing consciousness on the type of products the human being uses to satisfy basic needs or simply perform routine duties. Though, many of those the items used can cause harm to the environment. <em>Mothballs, oven cleaners, furniture polish and stain, and toilet bowl cleaners</em> are examples of those items that can put individuals and eventually societies at risk.
<em>By choosing less harmful products like the mentioned above and choosing alternative solutions to cover common activities, humanity's global footprint will be reduced.</em>
