Standardised testing has pros and cons. The ability for these tests to help students to prepare for the next grade or certain positions/jobs is very limited. Teachers are compelled to teach students towards tests, this can mean the difference between the school recieving government funding or not. This tends to reduce creativity in students, limiting them to producing their own answers to questions.
Due to standardised tests being marked by computers this causes conflicting arguments. Critics say multiple-choice tests are too simplistic, while advocates note that technology improvements feature items that demand more critical thinking before choosing a response. Open-ended questions allow students to display knowledge and apply critical thinking skills, but most require human readers.
Hope this gives some light on the question. But each person has their own oppinion if standardised tests are accurate or reliable in testing one's intellectual ability.
Answer:
A Structuralist would likely see a plant like image on a blank background, with leaves and some type of buds. On the buds, a mask or clown head appears to have bloomed. The head has human physical features, and looks like its face is painting white with a collar of some type around its neck. A NonStructuralist would believe there was imagery and symbolism. The plant could represent life or living, and the people or lives that grow and then die, and the lives yet to come to the world. The clown or figures face may represent a person or group, perhaps one which is misunderstood or disliked, based on the look of sadness and despair visible in the face. There are many theories that could be said, however the main difference is that a NonStructuralist would insist that there is symbolism and not just reality.
Explanation:
Please give branliest and thanks . I just took the test and got this one right
