A team of scientists has consistently gotten the same unexpected results from a set of experiments. Then "Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis" may helps the scientists to ensure the reliability of the results.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The roots of achieving unexpected results lie or depend on scientific methods used and analysis of data performed for acquiring results. Therefore when experiment results into unexpected readings researcher need to give a review of entire method and analysis.
Although rest other points like publication of results, discussing with friends and family members or removal of inconsistent data may or may not help depends upon conditions but reviewing helps as observed in many cases , because one must have performed unintentionally or intentionally an error while going through methods.
Answer:
Plant to animal to atmosphere.
Explanation:
- The carbon cycle describes the recycling of carbon from and back to the atmosphere.
- Plants utilize the carbondioxide present in the atmosphere to produce carbohydrates in the presence of light through the process of photosynthesis.
- When plants are consumed by animals, the carbon becomes a part of the animal.
- Animals break down glucose molecules into energy (ATP), releasing water and carbondioxide in a process called cellular respiration.
- This carbondioxide, as it is useless for animal cells, is released back into the atmosphere through gaseous exchange in the lungs.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
fhdjrkfififhfhdjdudjdjfhklaldhdfbfbfjdl
Carbon is removed from the atmosphere cause of plants because of the photosynthetic conversion of carbon dioxide in to carbohydrates.
Carbon enter that atmosphere by respiration of animals, volcanic eruptions, combustion of organic materials, and the decay of plant matter.
Hope this helps :)
