Try to find a mortgage to buy a house
Answer:
D. Top management
Explanation:
The top management of a company has the duty to oversee the entire company's operation. They are also the one that make a decision which will heavily influence the company's position in the future.
A decision for company to do business with subsidiaries with another country possess a lot of risk. It tends to require a lot of investment but with equally higher return. Decision with this magnitude will most likely fall to the hands of the top managers in the company.
Answer:
- what amount should Dart report as total revenues?
B. $250,000
Explanation:
The option B is the answer because the others option are not part of revenues during the year to the single step income.
The recovery of accounts written off are not part of revenues, it's an adjustment to the allowance for uncollectible accounts.
Then, the Purchase discounts is not part of revenues either, this kind of discounts goes directly to the valuation of inventory and then to the cost of goods.
Answer:
Bait and Switch
Explanation:
Bait and switch is a deceptive sales technique that draws customers in with the promise of low prices and then "switches" to say that the promised item is not available. It is actually illegal under <em>some </em>circumstances in the United States.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
