66 points ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Artyom0805 [142]
The thing which is the property, services, or money that a contract offeror provides to the offeree is a consideration.
<h3>What do you mean by a contract?</h3>
A contract refers to the enforceable agreement that defines and governs mutual rights and obligations among parties.
Consideration refers to anything of value that is given or promised such as money, property, services, or forbearance to induce another to enter into the contract.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the Contract here:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
Judicial activism interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values. ... Judicial restraint limits the powers of judges to strike down a law, opines that the court should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.
Answer:
criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who have committed crimes.
Explanation:
Criminal justice is letting a killer loose.
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
Answer:
If you mean by political parties then legislation will be made according to their beliefs.
Explanation:
For example, Democrats tend to be more liberal in their pieces of legislation like the Affordable Care Act passed under Obama's administration which focused on expanding healthcare. Whereas, Republicans tend to be more conservative like favoring tax breaks for the citizens of America. If this helps please rank Brainliest. Thank you!
