Answer:
Political and Legal
Explanation:
Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd. and BASF AG, two international pharmaceutical companies, were ordered to pay $725 million in fines for plotting to raise and fix prices of vitamins used in virtually every home in the U.S. This is an example of how <u>political and legal</u> forces affect the marketing environment.
Business organisations operate within a political system and legal framework. Political factors determine economic policies like taxation and regulations. Business decisions are subject to, and are affected by political and legal factors.
Governments formulate a series of legislations to monitor business activities and protect consumer and social interests.
Such laws would either create new opportunities or threats for the businesses in existence.
In the Scenario above Hoffman-LaRoche and BASF AG must have violated regulations that protect consumer interests put in place by the government by wanting consumers to pay too high for such necessities as vitamins and huge fines have been imposed on them.
Answer:
Debit to Salaries and Wages Expense for $40,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Salaries and wages was the amount of $40,000 which means that The Appropriate journal entry to record the monthly payroll on June 30 would include a DEBIT TO SALARIES AND WAGES EXPENSE FOR $40,000
Debit to Salaries and Wages Expense for $40,000
(To record monthly payroll)
Answer:
$6 million
Explanation:
If 25% of the firm is worth $1.5 million, then 100% of the firm will be worth $6 million (= $1.5 million x 4).
This is an all equity firm, which means it has no liabilities, and it is also a closely held corporation which makes it harder for a stockholder to sell his/her shares. Basically the fair value of the 1,000 shares is the money you can get from your fellow shareholders.
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.