<span>How did trickle-down economics claim to increase government tax revenues? By lowering tax rates. Lower tax rates helps the people by giving them a tax break that the wouldn't otherwise get. Paying taxes becomes expensive and it helps those when taxes decrease because they are able to keep more of their income and afford more than they would be able to otherwise. </span>
Answer:
Tax on a case of cola is $4 per case.
The burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case.
The burden that falls on producers is $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
Explanation:
Tax on a case of cola = Amount that consumers pay after the tax has been charged - Amount producers receive = $7 - $3 = $4 per case
Burden on consumers = Amount consumers pay after the tax has been levied - Amount consumers pay before tax was levied = $7 - $5 = $1 per case
Burden on producers = Tax on a case of cola - Burden on consumers = $4 - $1 = $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
Owners are not required to pay it to foreign works is incorrect option
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Taxes on goods with INELASTIC demand curves will tend to raise more tax revenue for the government than taxes on goods with ELASTIC.
Goods with inelastic demand are insensitive to price. An increase price of the goods for example from an increase in tax on the goods will have no significant effect in the quantity demanded. Consumers will still buy it with an higher. So taxing this goods is a good source of revenue for the government.
Whereas goods with elastic demand are very sensitive to rice. Any slight increase in price will result in a significant decrease in quantity demanded. So government increasing tax on this good will be bad for its tax revenue because consumers won't be it
