Answer:
Ans. The equilibrium rate of return on a 1-year Treasury bond is 6.65% (please check the explanation)
Explanation:
Hi, well, this type of bonds exist so people can avoid the time value of money risk, in other words, to keep money save from inflation and provide a risk free return at the same time. From a part of the text I can tell that the person who wrote it wanted to add up the risk free rate and the inflation rate, that is 3.05%+3.60% =6.65%.
This is why I wrote this answer, but the truth is that since they are both effective rates (risk free rate and inflation), they need to be add as effective rates, that is:

Therefore


So the real equilibrium rate of return is 6.76%, but for the sake of the question, I wrote 6.65%.
Best of luck.
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
Nirav recently opened a savings account offering 2% annual compound interest, this means that Nirav will earn the same amount of interest each year for four years.
<h3>What is a saving account?</h3>
An account at a retail bank is formally called as a savings account. This is a type of account that person granted a person that his money is safe in a particular bank. Refer to the image below for the complete question.
The given case tells about that <u>what would be the impact</u> of savings account offering 2% annual compound interest on Nirav, then he will earn the same amount of interest compounded each year for four years.
Learn more about the interest, refer to:
brainly.com/question/1040694
#SPJ1
Answer:
Their combined production should be 20 clothes and 12 wines.
Explanation:
<u>Argentina's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of cloth = 0.1 wine</u>
Argentina's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of wine = 10 clothes
Chile's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of cloth = 0.5 wine
<u>Chile's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of wine = 2 clothes</u>
Since Argentina' opportunity cost to produce clothes is lower, then it should specialize int he production of clothes. While Chile should specialize in the production of wine. Their combined production should be 20 clothes and 12 wines.
Answer:
Cash received from customers is $90,025 million
Cash paid to suppliers is $72,128 million
Explanation:
Cash received from customers is the net sales of $91,758 million minus the increase in accounts receivable since that is the portion of revenue yet to be received.
cash received from customers=$91,758 million-$1,733 million=$90,025 million
cash paid to suppliers is the cost of goods sold of $69,278 million plus the increase in inventory as well as the increase in accounts payable
cash paid to suppliers=$69,278 million+$883 million+$1,967 million=$72,128 million