All categories

2 years ago

Compare and contrast the landscapes of ancient Greece and Italy

2 answers:

8 0

Both have warm meditation landscapes but Greece being further south and further inland from large bodies of water it gets less rain than Italy and is also comprised up of many islands while Italy not so much

ExtremeBDS [4]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Italy's landscape was more varied and had much more potential, while Greece's landscape was monotonous and had little potential.

Explanation:

The landscapes of ancient Italy and ancient Greece differed a lot. Even though both areas are part of the Mediterranean region, the differences were very big, with Italy being much better suited for big development and progress while Greece was very limited.

Italy's landscape had everything from fertile plains, to wave lowlands, hillsides, and high mountains. There were areas dominated by forests, grasses, and shrubs, and some more typically Mediterranean in their appearance. Italy's landscape was very well suited for large-scale production of agricultural goods but also there were numerous natural resources as well.

Greece's landscape was very monotonous, being dominated by hills and mountains covered with Mediterranean flora. The soil was not of good quality and there were only very few cultures that can be grown, which is why a big portion of the population engaged in herding animals such as goats and sheep. The area was also poor in natural resources and it had very little potential for the creation of an empire.

You might be interested in

Which of the following religions are not major factors in South and Southeast Asia? Choose all that apply. Buddhism Christianity

Ber [7]

Christianity & Shintoism is not major factor in southeast Asia....

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

On the moon, impact craters accumulate over time

steposvetlana [31]

In the question the option that tells us the weakness of the sampling technique is that Samples were taken from both dark and bright lunar areas instead of concentrating on one area

<h3>What is a sampling technique?</h3>

The sampling technique can be defined as the name of the technique that helps in the identification of the specific process by which the entities that would be used in a sample has been chosen.

This is the way that the subset of a population can be used to make generalizations about the entire population that is existent in the study.

Hence we can ay that In the question the option that tells us the weakness of the sampling technique is that Samples were taken from both dark and bright lunar areas instead of concentrating on one area

Read more on sampling techniques here:

brainly.com/question/24466382

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago

In rare occasions, contour lines can intersect one another on a topographic map.

iris [78.8K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Contour lines can never cross one another. Each line represents a separate elevation, and you can't have two different elevations at the same point.

Hope this helps!

5 0

2 years ago

Describe the two processes by which sediments are transformed into sedimentary rocks. which is the more effective process in the

Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

1. Compaction occurs where pressure is placed on loosely packed sediment. The volume of the sediment is reduced and water is squeezed out.

2. Cementation occurs when mineral-bearing water circulates among the grains, hardens, and cements the sediment grains together. This process is most effective when lithifying sand and gravel-sized sediments.

Explanation:

3 0

1 year ago

Which star is hotter and many times<br> brighter than Earth's Sun?

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

The Betelgeuse Star

6 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers