Answer:
even temporary groups can pressure people to conform.
Explanation:
The complaint about bureaucracies is the red tape. It is believed that red tape delays action taking and slow the process of decision making.
<h3>What is bureaucracy?</h3>
Any organization with several departments, each with policy- and decision-making authority, is referred to as a bureaucracy.
Officials, employees, and persons in charge of government departments and offices, or comparable officers are some of bureaucracies.
Thus, option C is correct.
For further detail about bureaucracies refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/1100315
Answer:
D. Ethnocentrism
Explanation:
Ethnocentrism: In sociology, the term ethnocentrism is defined as one of the views that describe an individual's culture better than the culture of the other person. Ethnocentrism holds a belief of evaluating an individual's culture from the perspective or opinion's of someone else's.
The term ethnocentrism was introduced by William Graham Sumner during 1906. Nowadays, most of the sociologists represent ethnocentrism as one of the important characteristics of all different cultures.
In the question above, the given statement represents the term "ethnocentrism".
<span>a deeply ingrained and maladaptive pattern of behavior of a specified kind, typically apparent by the time of adolescence, causing long-term difficulties in personal relationships or in functioning in society.</span>
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. This is where federal cases are tried, where witnesses testify, and federal juries serve. There are 94 federal district courts in the United States. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
I think it's necessary. We live in a society in the process of building a democracy accessible to all people. Like every process, we are subject to failure. The justice system has been questioned by social movements about their decisions, often considered unfair. In this way, the possibility of appealing to a new analysis of the case is important so that some decisions are reviewed.
