Answer:
sexual sadism
Explanation:
Sexual sadism: In abnormal psychology, the term sexual sadism is defined as a mental disorder in which an individual faces or experiences sexual arousal as a result of humiliation, suffering, or extreme pain of another person. It can involve other conditions and elicit pain. It can also be referred to as a form of paraphilia yet not harmful and do not fulfill the criteria of paraphilia disorder.
Treatment: Medication and psychotherapy including cognitive-behavioral therapy.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of sexual sadism.
Boundaries that disregarded ethnic and religious differences most contributed to an absence of national identity in newly independent countries.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The powers that granted independence to the countries they ruled for long periods, also usually interfered in demarcating the boundaries of the regions before granting independence.
This demarcation of boundaries was not always done on the basis of ethnic and religious differences in the region. Thus, it often made the newly independent countries experience a lack of national identity among the people of the countries.
Answer:
the misinformation effect.
Explanation:
The misinformation effect is a psychological term that describes the occurrence of a situation in which an individual's recollection of episodic memories is affected by the subsequent incident information. This implies that the subsequent inflation affects or alters the memory of the actual event.
Hence, in this situation, the correct answer is "MISINFORMATION EFFECT."
Answer:
Explanation:
Public speaking training is important as there are various occasions in your professional or social life when you might be called on to speak publicly. You need to do it right and you need to do it effectively. If you are not confident about your own ability in this regard, then it makes sense to take public speaking training. I hope this helps :>
Answer:
false
Explanation:
A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.
