Answer : true
Explanation:
The facts has been established that every event has a cause, and without the cause, there will be no event.
Without any sign or clue of a potential event, it is not possible to identify the root cause, there is always an cause an effect but to understand the event ,we need to know the cause of such event.
So the above statement is true.
Answer:
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
For
1. Animals have always been used for experiments that are considered dangerous for humans, e.g lab rats.
This is necessary as some procedures are considered too dangerous for a human to undergo, and therefore, an animal is used to test the process.
2. Animals cannot talk, therefore, have no rights.
Animals, though living, do not have and enjoy the same rights that humans do according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This makes it possible to subject them to experiments because no rights are being infringed upon.
Against
1. It is unethical and inhumane to use animals for experiments
Animals have feelings and as such should not be used for unsafe experiments. The practise is inhuman and unethical as it is done without the consent of the animal.
2. Animals are living things and so they have rights.
Animals are living and such should be considered to have rights just as humans do and it would be wrong for any scientist to get any animal of his choice to perform experiments.
Answer
Congress can't make any laws prohibiting freedom of speech, freedom of press, and the right to peacefully assemble or petition the government for a redress of grievances, as well as no laws on religious establishments
