<u>C) Psychological factors </u>play a significant role in problematic emotions, behaviors, and thoughts.
Explanation:
Psychological factors like stress, aggression, depression, hopelessness, and job control are related to physical health. Pressure and frustration are the major cause of stress. Psychological factor influences the mental health of a person.
Psychotherapy is a way of treating people suffering from emotional difficulties and mental illness. The psychotherapy helps to understand a person’s mood, feeling, thoughts and behaviors.
Stress and aggression plays a major role in deciding one’s emotion, behavior and thoughts.
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
The correct answer would be, Informational Social Influence.
When we want to be correct but are uncertain or doubt our own judgement, we may look to the group as a source of accurate information. This tendency is referred to as Informational Social Influence.
Explanation:
In simple words, informational social influence is something when a person wants to gain knowledge about something, or he thinks he is not right about something. When a person seeks information or knowledge through some social group, it is referred to as informational social influence.
Very simple example of informational social influence can be taken as, if a person goes to another country, where he does not know about the culture or rituals of the country, then he tends to ask the local people who belong to that country and seeks knowledge about their culture and norms and rituals. This is called as informational social influence.
Learn more about Informational Social Learning at:
brainly.com/question/9397478
#LearnWithBrainly
The other persons insurance unless they do not have insurance if you have full coverage your insurance company will cover it usually including you pay your deductible and in both cases you can't take them to court by filing a small civil suit and making a report in the police station. Assuming you have a plate number or name that identifies the other party they will be obligated to go to court and if they don't they will recieve a bench warrant or also know as FAT warrant either way these things do take time but each step is a step closer to you winning your case and well deserved compensation
Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
