Answer:
The NS eventually becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS).
Explanation:
In classical conditioning, a conditioned stimulus can be defined as a neutral stimulus that has become associated with an unconditioned stimulus and, eventually, begins to trigger a conditioned response. A classical example is ringing a bell (NS) at the same time you offer food (US) to a dog. The dog will salivate (UR) because of the food, not because of the bell. However, if you repeat this several times, eventually the sound of the bell will go from a neutral stimulus (NS) to a conditioned stimulus (CS). It will begin to trigger the now conditioned response of salivation (CR), even if there is no food.
This is what is in psychology called cognitive complexity. Cognitive complexity allows us to imagine and construct many different scenarios and analyze certain behaviors and though are thinking processes find out what the causes for those behaviors are. This is a characteristic of how complex a persons perceptual skill is.
Yes, there were huge plagues in Ancient Rome that caused all kind of devastation.....
One of the FIRST of the BIG plagues was the Antonine Plague, 165-180 AD, also known as the Plague of Galen, an ancient pandemic, whether of smallpox or measles, they are not sure, claimed the lives of TWO Roman emperors.
The disease broke out again 9 years later and caused up to 2,000 deaths a DAY at Rome, one quarter of those infected.
Total deaths have been estimated at five million.
Disease killed as much as one-third of the population in some areas, and decimated the Roman army.
This thing traveled far too, up into Gaul, all over Roman Europe.
The Plague of Justinian may have been the first instance of bubonic plague and was one of the causes of the Fall of the Roman Empire.
Smaller but no less deadlier plagues played havoc throughout the Roman Empire over many years.
Diseases from unkept Roman plumbing with the ground water mixing in with rain water.
<span>The style of leadership at Zappos is most closely aligned with autocratic leadership. This style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian style and is characterized by a leader who makes all the decisions for the group and allows little or no input from the other members. <span>This type of leadership is beneficial when in a group one must perform delicate tasks that leave no margin for error or change, but group members rarely feel comfortable with this style of leadership.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
