]Why did American political leaders create a weak central government in the Articles of Confederation?

History

1 answer:

schepotkina [342]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

feared that a strong central government would revive a dictatorial government

To avoid tax and tariffs from a central government

to protect the native rights of the people

Explanation:

After the American War of Independence, the leaders and founding members of the constitution created a weak central government in the Articles of Confederation due to the following reasons:

1. The leaders feared that a strong central government would revive a dictatorial government because of the experiences they had with the British Crown.

2. To avoid tax and tariffs from a central government that has nothing or very less to do with their economic lives. They firmly stood against 'taxation without representation' and believed that the central government cannot levy any taxes but only the state governments could.

3. They leaders wanted to protect the native rights of the people endowed by their own respective state governments. They feared that if too much of powers were given to the central government, it would take away some of their rights.

You might be interested in

The National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) argued that:

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer On September 30, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson gives a speech before Congress in support of guaranteeing women the right to vote. Although the House of Representatives had approved a 19th constitutional amendment giving women suffrage, the Senate had yet to vote on the measure.

Read up on the 19th amendent!!

7 0

3 years ago

What message might these frequent and violent changes in leadership have sent to people of the Roman Empire?

tester [92]

They would have told them that we are not that well of a nation and when you send off those vibes they will see you as an easy target and so they will try to atack

4 0

3 years ago

How did the slave trade affect West Africa?

hodyreva [135]

Explanation:

The slave trade had devastating effects in Africa. Economic incentives for warlords and tribes to engage in the slave trade promoted an atmosphere of lawlessness and violence. Depopulation and a continuing fear of captivity made economic and agricultural development almost impossible throughout much of western Africa.

6 0

2 years ago

Compare the Chinese and Indian approaches to the patriarchal family

Marysya12 [62]

It really depends on the time period, but if we're talking in general, China had Confucian views, while India had the caste system. Both were very patriarchal, but China's social system was more based on family values and India was more focused on jobs. China was way more strict ("women should stay in the house", foot binding, etc.) I hope this helps somewhat. :)

4 0

3 years ago

The Quakers rejected slavery on the grounds that: it contributed to a maldistribution of wealth. it contradicted the Christian c

Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

The Quakers rejected slavery on the grounds that it contradicted the Christian concept of brotherhood.

Explanation:

The Quakers are a religious movement that originated among Christian English dissenters in the mid-17th century. At the end of the 1600s, many Quaker immigrants emigrated to North America, where William Penn founded Pennsylvania.

Quakers imagine that there is something of God within every human being, which, like an inner light, can guide one. The movement emphasizes that each person must find his or her own way to God, that God exists within every human being, and that the personal experience of God is the only guidance a human can have. Therefore, as God lived in every human, even in African-Americans, men were all equal and as a consequence brothers under God. This religious view, therefore, made them reject slavery during the 19th Century.

7 0

3 years ago