Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer:
lower prices.
Explanation:
Lower prices.
The more the production, the more will be supply of the goods. So, according to the basic law of supply and demand the prices would go down.
These symbols showed leading role in socialist society and showed that they are unified. They are one unit.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The flag of the communist party had a hammer and a sickle. These symbols on this flag represented leading role in the socialist society to unify the people as one unit.
It also showed the importance of peasants and the workers in the building of the communism. This was a message to the people of America that the people of communist party were united and had power in their unity. They also showed the importance of peasants and workers in their society.