The difference between insight and associative learning is that associative learning relies on trial and error, whilst insight learning is the ability to solve the problem without going through trial and error.
<h2>
Associative and Insight learning.</h2>
Conditioning is a theory that asserts behavior can be influenced or learnt based on a stimulus and a response. Associative learning is a type of conditioning. This means that depending on the response a behavior causes, it can be learnt or unlearned. For example, a student may be aware that she will not be permitted to go out for recess (response) if she misbehaves in class (stimulus).
A sudden discovery of a solution to a problem is referred to as insight learning. Insight learning differs from trial-and-error learning in that it occurs suddenly, whereas trial-and-error learning involves more thorough experimentation to come at a solution. Hearing a song on the radio and recognizing the artist based on the sound of his or her voice is an example of this.
Learn more about insight learning here: brainly.com/question/25650156
Answer:
Vacuole
Explanation:
The vacuole is one of the largest organelles in a plant cell because it holds the water, food, and waste of the cell.
Answer:
a. ATP and NADPH
Explanation:
Light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis include splitting of water in the presence of sunlight and release of electrons. The electrons move from the reaction center of the PS-II via electron carriers to the PS-I. From the reaction center of PS-I, the electrons finally reach NADP reductase and reduce NADP into NADPH.
During this electron transfer via electron carriers, a proton concentration gradient is generated across the thylakoid membrane. The energy of this gradient is used to drive ATP synthesis. ATP and NADPH formed during the light-dependent phase of photosynthesis are then used during the reactions of the Calvin cycle.
Answer:
Restate the overall purpose of the experiment. (Why did you do this experiment? What did it teach you?)
2. What were the major findings? (summarize the data you collected)
3. Was the hyposthesis supported by the data? (state your hypothesis and explain how your data relates to your hypothesis)
4. How could this experiment be improved? (If you did this again what could you do differently?)
5. What could be studied next after this experiment? (What else could you test to help you better understand this topic
Explanation:
Answer: all of them
Explanation: I think they’re all true
Hope this helps!
