The Supreme Court believes that overcrowding in prisons is cruel and unusual and this violates their human rights despite being prisoners. Therefore, the federal government exercises the standards in prison population. So how the Supreme Court usually rule in cases regarding this matter is that it upholds the 8th Amendment.
Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
Answer:
A) Extending control over the economy
Explanation:
Both monarchs wanted to have powerful countries: they built magnificent palaces to glorify their power (Versailles and Saint Petersburg), engaged in wars to add more territories, and forced nobility to westernize to improve armies for example, but both failed or missed to give strength and health to country economy, and increased poverty levels in their populations, as all these improvement goals rendered a lot of expenses to the State.
Britain was blockading US ports, taking our impending our sailors, and hurting trade.
Kennedy also made it plain that he supported the 'Domino Theory' and he was convinced that if South Vietnam fell to communism, then other states in the region would as a consequence. They believed that just a small increase in US support for Diem would ensure success in Vietnam.
