Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
Of the options given, the most likely member of a utilitarian organization is<u> a. </u><u>Angela</u><u>, who works as a </u><u>lawyer </u><u>at a </u><u>prestigious law firm </u><u>and </u><u>earns $60,000 annually.</u>
A utilitarian organization is one where:
- Employees receive some sort of compensation for their work
- Employees are usually contracted to a company to provide a certain service
Angela is receiving a compensation of $60,000 annually and is a lawyer which means that they are probably contracted to the law firm.
We can therefore conclude that Angela is working for a utilitarian organization based on the fact that there is compensation and contract.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/13956837. </em>
hey there!:
1)
a) Amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions = 2896.21
(56900*3.1%*90%)+(56900*(5.4%-3.1%)) = 2896.21
b) Amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax = 517.79
(56900*6%)-2896.21 = 517.79
c) Amount that the company lost because of its late payments = 176.39
=517.79-(3414-1763.9-1308.7) = 176.39
Hope that helps!
The answer is $0.00 (third option).
Explanation:
During the year of 2018, the annual exclusion of both federal and state tax to cash gifts was up to $15,000 per individual. <em>Annual exclusion</em> means that there's up to a certain amount of money that can be gifted without being taxable. In this case, John and Joan's cash gift falls within the limit.
When couples gift money to their family members, the limit is precisely $15,000 per relative, individually; meaning the can gift up to a total of $60,000 without being subject to gift tax.
The journal entry to replenish the petty cash account is credit to Cash for $266.
<h3>How would petty cash be replenished?</h3>
The amount that needs to be replenished is:
= Petty cash fund - cash
= 298 - 32
= $266
This amount needs to be taken from the cash account which is why the cash account will be credited with $266.
Find out more on the petty cash fund at brainly.com/question/27585546
#SPJ1
