The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
Society would fall and crumble if everyone did that
The impact of the cooling-off treaties William Jennings Bryan negotiated to resolve disputes between countries by calling for disputes between countries to be resolved using diplomacy, they promoted stability and helped prevent wars.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
William Jennings Bryan got very famous because of the treaties he proposed which were known as the cooling treaty and the aim of such treaties was to resolve disputes between the countries and if these could not resolve the dispute, countries would at least wait for a year before starting the war and try to find some outside facts. Therefore they were meant to bring peace and cooperation among the countries and avoid wars.
Cotton could also be obtained from Egypt and India
Im going with pictorial data
