The stage direction in a play that indicates that more than one character leaves the stage at the same time is exeunt.
Exeunt as the stage direction is used to direct all or certain identified characters to exit the stage. Exeunt as stage directive that means "persons leave the stage" and is commonly used in plays by William Shakespeare and other Elizabethan dramatists. Notably, it appears at the conclusion of numerous Shakespearean plays and acts.
It ought to be understood that a character is just the subject of a literary work. The stage direction exeunt indicates that everyone goes away or leaves.
To learn more about stage direction here
brainly.com/question/21059244
#SPJ1
Answer:
D an ish and Fr isi ans were the two nations
Code of ethics are guidelines while censorship is a rule of law. There are some technical laws in the nation that may allow for this to happen if it is pushed.
Explanation:
Code of ethics are general guidelines over content that are maintained so as to maintain the sanctum of the medium and is not imposed legally.
it is just used to pressure people into making the sort of content that needs to be made according to the enforcer.
But those who defy are not liable to losses.
This is not the case in censorship when people are penalized for going against the set of guidelines and may even get criminal sentences
This has been going on for a long time in the country under the new age and in the world.
Answer:
A representative democracy is a system of government where citizens elect representatives to vote on laws on their behalf. A direct democracy is one where citizens vote on every issue themselves. The key difference between the two systems is who is voting on laws, elected officials or the citizens.The Founders of the United States had to decide how much say the people would have in their government. After escaping British rule, they wanted the people to have representation, but they were also concerned that the average citizen wasn’t educated enough to vote properly. They decided to balance both interests and choose a system where the people would select officials that would vote for them. However, they didn’t necessarily have to design the government this way. The American people could have voted on laws and issues themselves instead of through a spokesperson. These two systems are called a representative democracy and a direct democracy, respectively.Representative democracies like the United States have their pros and cons. On the one hand, the US is very large, and less than half of all Americans vote in any given election. This means that it could be difficult to consistently contact the entire nation for votes, though technology has certainly made the idea far more possible. The main question is whether or not the public would engage in the process properly. People lead very busy lives, and much of the voting would require research, especially complicated problems dealing with subjects like the economy or foreign relations, where ordinary citizens don’t have much experience.
However, convenience comes at the price of control. Electing officials to vote for you is riskier than voting yourself; you never know what other factors are playing a role in their decision. Campaign money, wanting to be reelected, and personal morals could all cause a divide between what the people want and what an official votes for. Additionally, when one representative speaks for a whole group of people, some minority voices will inevitably be overpowered. In a representative democracy, it is harder for the people to assert their power. So, every citizen needs to take voting seriously and make their voices known to their local and state elected officials.
Explanation:Brainliest pls
The correct answer is Noun
