Okay, well seeing as this is a question about opinions, it really doesn't matter what you write as long as it makes sense.
In my opinion, the number of house representatives must increase to adjust for increase in population. As there are more people to represent, everyone should be represented equally, which cannot happen if the representatives of the house are allowed to represent for an ever increasing amount of people. If the representatives are not increased as population increases, there will inevitably be an increase of population that is not fairly represented in the House, which is problematic as it is already an issue.
If this is the same as "William the Conqueror" then I'd go for 1066. There's a sort of comic history book written once called "1066 and all that".
The answer is C. Did little to change American attitudes toward Growth and Expansion
The Panic of 1819 was the first major financial crisis in the US, but it doesn't stopped US attitudes towards Growth and Expansion, we still continued to do westward Expansion in the middle of financial crisis ( We acquired Ohio and northern Mississippi around year 1820)
Meiji reformers wished to reintroduce imperialism in Japan.
1863-General Lee lead the Confederate troops into Pennsylvania. He surprised the units in Gettysburg and the battle was the most crucial and bloodiest of the war. The victory at Gettysburg belonged to Lincoln and the Union. Turning point; last offensive attack of the South.