This statement is FALSE.
The European Union is constituted by 28 member states, and not all of them are republics. For example, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands are constitutional monarchies.
It is not a partnership but a form of supranational integration. The level of integration is not as deep as the one that can be found in a federal country like the US. Its member states have established a common market, free movement of people and goods, a common currency, common foreign policy and even certain levels of political integration. Many other aspects such as the fiscal policy, are decided at the state level and the EU has no authority over them.
The Bush Doctrine of the early 2000's can be best described as idealism and unilateralism. At the time, the <span>United States became engaged in policies across the globe that were driven by neoconservative ideology.</span>
Answer:
It is your decision on if it is right, but I will give insight on the very basics of how our government deals with power distribution and why. And a touch of opinion. Happy New Year!
Explanation:
Giving the president the power of executive authority would make our government the same as a dictatorial one. That is one of the main reasons our government has 3 branches, it’s a checks and balances system that keeps those in power relying on each other to make decisions. The question of if it is right that a president should or shouldn’t have executive authority has raged on every since America first considered becoming independent from Britain, but based on the numerous times a British monarch given executive authority abused it, we can guess the same thing could easily happen with our president. At the very least a president should not have full freedom in passing policies, but the real difficult question is “To what extent should a president be able to pass policies, and congress oversee the affairs of the president?” This question applies to not just the president and Congress, but also the judicial branch and state governments. It’s a tough question.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The three examples of how the “Bill of Rights “ reflected the mood, values, and history of the American colonists are the following.
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States.
1.- Freedom of speech. An important component of the first amendment is the right of US citizens to express their opinions. Colonists really wanted to have a voice and be heard.
2.- Freedom of religion. Another important component of the first amendment. There were colonists in Massachusetts, for instance, that came to the North American territory to freely profess and practice their religion as was the case of the Puritans in the Plymouth colony.
3.- Freedom of Assemble. It was very important for the colonists to gather together in their homes or public places to talk about the problems and issues they had with the monarchy of Great Britain.
