The best answer that you should choose is A. That's the answer I would go with...
The correct answer is C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure.
Mexican citizens had conflicting views of Porfirio Diaz’s rule because he limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure
Porfirio Díaz (1830-1915) was the Mexican dictator that ruled the country from 1876 to 1911. He was a controversial figure in Mexican politics. On one side, he was an unyielding dictator and suppressed people's liberties, but on the other hand, he had the vision to modernize México and heavily invested in the construction of railroads to connect the country and to improve transportation and trade.
The other options of the question were A) He had a popular agenda of liberal reform but he did not institute policies that led to a lasting change. B) He led Mexico to military victories but he did not achieve great social and economic stability. C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. D) He made strides in reducing the economic gap but he was a harsh and unyielding dictator.
<span>As part of the war effort, the government rationed foods like sugar, butter, milk, cheese, eggs, coffee, meat and canned goods. Labor and transportation shortages made it hard to harvest and move fruits and vegetables to market. So, the government turned to its citizens and encouraged them to plant "Victory Gardens." They wanted individuals to provide their own fruits and vegetables.</span>
Democrat- Senator Stephen Duoglas
Republican- Abraham Lincoln
hope it helps ;)
Answer:
Germany.
Explanation:
Hitler took over Germany in the 1930's when he was elected as the Supreme Chancellor of Germany, which is another name for a dictator. He built up his military and created a Totalitarian society.
good day, and be safe
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
⊕ΘΞΠΤ⊕
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
