1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jasenka [17]
3 years ago
12

What law reduced the average tariff on imported foods to about 30 percent of value of the goods?

History
1 answer:
xenn [34]3 years ago
4 0
B clayton anti trust act
You might be interested in
What is an example of a political terrorist group?
m_a_m_a [10]
The Irish Republican Army fighting for the unification of a whole Ireland. 
5 0
4 years ago
What group led Parliament after the execution of the English king in 1649?
trapecia [35]
Oliver Cromwell<span>'s </span><span>New Model Army or just New Model Army, is the answer.
Hope this helps. :)</span>
4 0
4 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 25 Points
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

We can think about the outcomes of this voyage in both the short and the long term.In the short term, the voyages led to the destruction of the natives of the lands that Columbus found.  Some of them were killed outright.  Others were enslaved.  Many died of diseases brought by the Europeans.  This was the main impact of these voyages in the very short term.Later, Columbus’s voyages led to the domination of the area from Mexico south to Peru by the Spanish.  This resulted in the destruction of the major native civilizations like the Incas and the Aztecs.  It also resulted in the enrichment and empowerment of Spain.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did workers dread layoffs?
Sveta_85 [38]
They didn’t have insurance
4 0
3 years ago
Samuel Adams, and his idea of state rights, was supported by the party of?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:the new nation

Those who did not support the Constitution came to be known as Anti-Federalists or ‘states-rights men’ and their most notable representative was Patrick Henry (who had refused to attend the Convention because of his suspicion of it, declaring “I smell a rat, tending toward monarchy

Others included George Clinton, Richard Henry Lee and Mercy Otis Warren, the female chronicler. Thomas Jefferson was also sharply critical of the Constitution, though he actively supported some parts of it, and later explained that he was not fully Anti-Federalist but somewhere between the two positions.

As a group, Anti-Federalists were concerned about several issues. They feared that sovereignty, autonomy and states’ rights would be trampled by the newly-empowered national government. They argued that over time the power and influence of the states would be eroded or ‘drained’ by the federal government. They worried that the centralisation of power would put control into the hands of an urban-based elite. They expressed concern that the president, with control of the army, might become a military dictator (“[the presidency] would be a foetus of monarchy!” said Edmund Randolph). They feared the separation of powers in the Constitution was not strong enough or distinct enough. They panicked about the possible implications for personal liberties like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to worship freely, which to many Americans had been the real driving issue behind the revolution.

A historian’s view:

“The basic concept stressed [in many anti-Federalist works] was the evil effect of power. ‘The love of power is natural… it is insatiable…’ wrote Burgh. ‘Power renders men wanton, insolent to others and fond of themselves,’ observed Gordon and Trenchard… This mistrust of power was characteristic of American political thought during this period.”

Unlike their opposition, the Anti-Federalists did not engage in a coordinated and sustained propaganda barrage. While the Federalist Papers appeared as 85 single editions, published regularly and with clear arguments and tone, the Anti-Federalists wrote sporadically, using pseudonyms such as Cato, Federal Farmer  Centinel and Brutus. The quality of their pamphlets did not approach those of the Federalists. Intellectually outgunned and lacking a figurehead leader such as Washington, the Anti-Federalists were not able to convince enough of their cause, though they enjoyed plenty of support, particularly in the larger states and in the south. Some Americans saw the flaws in both sides and supported neither the federalist or anti-federalist points-of-view. The picture above, The Looking Glass for 1787: A House Divided against itself cannot Stand, shows the two camps pulling the state of Connecticut apart with their constant bickering and equivocation.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Japan attack China in 1937, launching the Second Sino-Japanese War?
    5·1 answer
  • Why were people disillusioned after the war in 1920s
    6·1 answer
  • How does stare decisis affect decisions made by the Supreme Court?
    15·2 answers
  • Correctly match the word with the description
    15·1 answer
  • A company makes $200,000 in a year and has $150,000 in production costs, leaving them with $50,000. The $200,000 represents .
    9·2 answers
  • Which central government agency was responsible to provide news on the war?
    10·2 answers
  • What caused the fall of the Qin dynasty?
    14·2 answers
  • what is the meaning of the quote "Without feelings of respect, what is there to distinguish men from beast"
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ME<br><br> Congress expressed values to the Northwest Territories such as________
    9·1 answer
  • Why would Americans in free states want the slave states to remain part of the United States, as opposed to just letting them le
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!